DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
TAL
Docket No: 7039-13
14 August 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 August 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative ~
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with ail material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
27 March 2007 at age 18. Based on the information currently
contained in your record it appears that you were subsequently
involuntarily processed for an entry level separation by reason
of erroneous entry. In connection with this processing, you
would have acknowledged the separation action and the separation
authority would have approved a recommendation for separation.
The record clearly shows that on 11 April 2007, you were
discharged with an entry level separation by reason-of erroneous
entry. At that time you were assigned an RE-4 reentry code,
which means that you were neither recommended nor eligible for
reenlistment.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, and
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded
these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the
reentry code. Regulations authorized the assignment of an RE-4
reentry code when an individual is discharged by reason of
erroneous entry. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
‘It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
* the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence’ or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0732 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. On 6 March 2013, you were diagnosed with hepatitis B which existed prior to your enlistment and recommended for administrative separation. The Board noted that an RE-3E is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2924 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on.the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03522-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2932 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with 211 matexiai submitced in suppost thereof, your naval record, and appiicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, individuals separated within the first 180 days of service are discharged without a characterization of service and you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06087-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04521-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2011. You are advised that an RE-3E reentry code is the most favorable code you could have been assigned and may be waived by prior service recruiting personnel. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3954 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations allow the assignment of an RE-8 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04394-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. The Board was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07991-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03505-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...